Follow Us on Twitter

Separate Telangana Movement

The word “culture” is defined as the sum of attitudes, customs and beliefs that distinguishes one group of people from another. Culture is transmitted through language, material objects, ritual, institutions and art from one generation to the next. So statehood is formed on the basis of attitudes, customs and belief that form a separate culture.

Of late, there has been a distinct trend of divisiveness in a single culture; people living inside the state and sharing one culture want to create a different state. As it is said in the proverbial language that “a brother demanding his share from joint property of family”. There are causes bordering on nuances in one culture that raise the demand for separation by a group of people.

  • Telangana is a vast area in the state of Andhra Pradesh of India, consisting of 10 districts. Those are Hyderabad,Adilabad, Khammam, Karim nagar, MahbubNagar,Medak, Nalgonda,Nizamabad, Rangareddy and Warangal.
  • It shares borders with states of Maharastra on the north side, Karnataka on the west, Chattisgrah on the north and Orissa on the east. It is spread over the area of 1, 14,840 square kilometers.
  • Historically, the state of Andhra Pradesh went through transitions in different periods of time. In the 14th century, the area under “Telangana” came under the rule of Sultanate of Delhi. Later, the rules of Bahamanis, Quatb sahis and Mughals came in succession.
  • The Mughal Empire was on its last legs in the 18th century, when the Muslim Asifiahi dynasty established their rule and created Hyderabad as a separate state. Later, Hyderabad entered into a treaty with the British and formed a princely Hyderabad state. But Telangana was not directly under British rule, unlike the Coastal Andhra Pradesh and Royalseema regions. Those remained under the British India’s Madras presidency. This area came under numerous dynasties.

Beginning of “Telangana” movement in the before the days of independence

The first movement began with the revolt of peasants with the support of Communists. It continued from 1946 and lasted up to 1951. In this, farmers and laborers revolted against the feudal landlords. The peasants and laborers demanded that the entire debt from the landlords be waived off because the latter always exploited them.

In the post-independent India, the state of Hyderabad was annexed by an operation by the Indian Army in the year 1948 as the Nizam of Hyderabad refused to accede to India. The operation was called “Operation Polo”. In December 1953, the States reorganization commission was formed to study and recommend steps to form states on linguistic basis by the Central government of India. The commission was not in favor of merging Telangana with Andhra Pradesh.

The commission stated that the people of Telangana had several concerns. The areas under it had a less developed economy than Andhra Pradesh and people there feared that as the people of Andhra Pradesh were more educated during the British rule, they would take lions’ share in education and government jobs in the post-independence period. So the commission recommended that Telengana be made a separate state with a provision to get merged with Andhra Pradesh only after the general election of 1961.

But things were destined to go in a different direction. The then Chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, Burgala Ramakrishna Rao, expressed his views that the majority of the people were against the merger and he supported the Congress party’s decision to merge Telangana with Andhra Pradesh. The Andhra State assembly assured the people of Telangana through a special resolution that they would be provided with safeguards in every provision of development in the forthcoming years after Indian independence.

Thus the unified Andhra Pradesh was formed on November 1, 1965 under the central leadership with the assurances that the interests of the Telangana would be best looked after in the coming days.

Birth of demand for separate state for Telangana

In the year 1965, the students of Osmania University began the protest against the discrimination meted out to Telangana people in getting government jobs. This stir was also supported by teachers in the University. Discontent grew as some of guarantees in the agreement were not implemented by the government. Officially, this stir came to an end in the year 1972.

But from that time, the agitation for creating a separate Telangana state has continued. A particular mention might be made about the Srikrishna Committee report, which was prepared in two volumes and submitted to the central government in the year 2010 on 30th December.The committee recommended to keep the state united without going for the creation of separate “Telengana” state. It also recommended creation of a statutorily powerful “Telangana regional council”. The focus of the report remained on the overall growth of the Telangana region through different measures.

But the people of Telangana have always adhered to their demand for a separate state. After the Srikrishna committee report, people of it observed a 14 days non-cooperation movement against the state government in the year 2011. In this almost 3, 00,000 government employees participated and it cost millions of rupees of loss to the exchequer of the state.

Logical grounds for creation of a separate “Telangana” state

  • In the year 2000, three new states were formed in India. The first one was Uttarrakhand out of Uttar Pradesh, the second one was Jharkhand out of Bihar and the third one was Chattisgarh out of Madhya Pradesh. Telangana sounds a similar chord so far as the basic issues behind it are concerned.
  • By and large, Telangana movement is related with the core sentimental values of people of a part of our nation. Lack of growth and a sense of alienation and negligence in the areas of development are the three chief causes motivating people to seek an independent state from the rest of Andhra Pradesh.
  • If like the other newly created three states of India, growth gets the maximum focus then creation of a separate state out of Andhra Pradesh would be a welcome idea.

Will separate “Telangana” form?

There is something well said that “United we stand, divided we fall”. Andhra Pradesh is a model state in the areas of overall growth. Except drought and Naxalism, it has remained at the forefront of development in almost all areas. Maximum efforts must be made to remove the disparities between the people of Telangana with the rest of people of Andhra Pradesh.

There are also similar demands in other states of India to form another state out of a particular one. Creating infrastructure for a new state requires heavy expenditure and slowdown of growth. It is due to the fact creation and proper functioning of a political set-up and governance take time and it takes even longer to mature and keep pace with the fast development of other states. People of Telangana should exercise discretion from every angle, while raising their demand for a separate state.

Related

Tags: , , , ,
Subscribe to Comments RSS Feed in this post

11 Responses

  1. i want telangana when will cum.

  2. hieee guys …

    sooo d matter is abt telangana here….vl u plss andhrites temme anythng r something dat u havnt robbed in ne aspct, us dese many yrs….?

    u ppl stl robbing n rapng all our resources still…
    y u ppl r split frm madras dat tym….d same way v want to split..n fr d same reasons…

    to enhance ur livelihood…u startd ‘jai andhra’ movmnt…jus to violate the ‘mulki’ rules…

    y u need d non local jobs.. ?
    u ppl hv created d fake native certfcts n obtained d jobs…

    u hv merged wid d telangana, jus to loot us….n hyd state is a princely state alrdy..developd with all…n has many resources..dat benefits u….

    ppl nw in telangana, whole heartdly doing dis movmnt…n raising der voice fr seperate telangana….

    dnt agn hide urselves wid…”all telugu talkng ppl, one state”…

    no….v need our seperate state….n nehru alrdy quoted…if 1day telangana ppl demand seperate state..its der right to get it….

  3. your article lacks in expressing people aspiration…
    remember the present situation came because they are united..and ur article did said about how many agreements entered to safeguard the telangana have been breached and neglected..and i suggest u to ref BBC report on telangana which is unbiased.

  4. No where in the article, it is mentioned that there is no need to form a separate Telangana state. Rather the causes for forming a separate state have been specifically given in “logical grounds” for creating it. The last part of the article is an appeal to all to remain united and rationale behind staying united and be part of growth.

    • you are saying that staying united will help growth… in unity with people of andhra, the people of telangna lost everything in their lives.. In 56 years history of united andra pradesh, the leaders from the telangana region ruled for only 5-6 years. Is this the growth & development with unity.. they are struggling for their self respect..

      • ha ha thats a great joke santhosh do u know KCR was a member of Telangana movement in 1960′s but after movement completed KCR joined congress and Telangana person became Chief Minister and then KCR became MLA of congress and then Congress people themselves stopped the hesitations and enjoyed their ministries. I want to ask 1 thing now in state leader was not there why after NTR started a party Telangana movement stopped???
        Why at time of CBN,KCR didn’t got ministry and started a new party on Telangana ???

        Do u believe KCR words ???If so KCR already announed in Congess done diksha in august that “Congress is giving Telanagana in 1 week i am contact with them”???

        Do u think TDP (a regional party with 5 mp seats) can stop giving Telangana in central want to give it????

        Do u believe in KCR????Do u think he is fighting for Telangana???On whom he is fighting on congress or TDP????

        Answer is so simple TDP,On a regional party he is fighting.In sakalajanula Samme KCR was meeting congress people K.K for morning tiffin, and Ponnam prabhakar,Madu yaski…. congress leaders was roaming in same car along with KTR and Kavitha and making dramas in the name of supportings.

        If KCR wants Telanagnaa TDP or congress will give?? Whom did KCR or kodandaram must fight???

        Answer is congress but TRS& Congress combinely fighting on TDP is it right if u like KCR then it might be right but if ur a normal people who supports Telangana u will not like it.

        Do u think KCR fighting for formation of Telangana???
        Answer is NO he is trying to expand his party now if u think he is fighting it is a foolish thing say1 thing KCR done for Telangana???

      • TRS like party was there in 1969 movement also name of party is Telangana Praja Samithi party it was united after they jai andhra udyamam, same TRS will be soon merged into congress.

        In 1972, candidates of the Telangana Praja Samithi party contested all the available seats for the assembly elections. However, only Thakkalapalli Purushothama Rao got elected, from Wardhannapet constituency in Warangal District.Telangana Praja Samithi party is then after elections it is united into congress.

    • the situation have crossed from balance of regional development to balance of regions people’s development. they developed hyd only to exploit it, at the expense of telanganites…the aspect of still staying united is foolishness. many provisions were made then..and were also breached…then what is the logic behind staying together with some additional provisions..and I am expecting a response for this

  5. Mr Mohanty, i would like to ask u some questions regarding seperate TELANGANA……
    if there is really no need for separate state then1. why every party in Andra pradesh (all regional & national parties) in their MANIFESTO
    2.Why the PRESIDENT OF INDIA included it in his SPEECH
    3.Why the GOVT OF INDIA announced that STARTING THE PROCEDURE for TELANGANA IN PARLIAMENT on DEC 9th 2009
    if there is really no need then what is reason for suicides of people from the region of telangana.. if there is really no need for separate telangana then why CHIEF MINISTER AND OTHER MINISTERS not attending any program in the region of telangana except hyd… please give reply

    • HI<
      i think telangana state formation has no meaning…..because the telangana people are falsely injected in their minds by telangana politicians…i agree with mr.zeer…there was no problems arised during TDP…now due to this bandh the people of telangana are suffering…and by d way…we are all telugu people..we differ ourself based on regions due to some false rumours…even im frm telangana region i dont think so telangana state should be formed..forming a state also meant to disrespect our telugu language…its the people who need to realise the differences…if u want to participate in rally or hunger strike u fight for developing telangana region or culture so tht even coastal andhra and rayalaseema region people will participate along with u..but dont fight for state for useless reasons..