Follow Us on Twitter

Idealism vs Ideology – A tribute to Jyoti Basu

Jyoti Basu, the doyen of Indian politics has passed away.

Jyoti Basu represents a generation of leaders from right and left, who got into politics, not for the desire of power, but powered by an idealism to achieve something for their fellow human beings.

Jyoti Basu often believed and wrote that it is man and man alone who creates history.  He believed that despite many ups and downs, people will finally emerge victorious and walk the path of freedom in a classless society free from exploitation of any form.

This is the idealism and vision that powered his entry into politics.  Not just for him, for  many Indian leaders of the past, from left and right, their idealism was the driving force in politics.

Jyoti Basu was also committed to his ideology of communism. He saw communism as the only way for establishing an exploitation free society and empowering every human being to real freedom.

This idealism and ideology are what made Jyoti Basu and most older members of the left and right movements in India.

While some people may say that India became backward due to Communist parties or Socialist aberrations of Nehru, I won’t agree to that. Strange but true, Communists have contributed to a large bourgeoisie in India.

Instead of the poor, Communists have been largely active in the educated , organized and middle-class sections of India. In fact this is one of the reasons why largely agrarian and poor India have not been able to identify itself with the communist movement.

India was either rich or poor. It never had a powerful middle-class. Communists played a huge role in creating this powerful middle-class, post independence. It is because of their fight for working class people, that we see a large number of middle-class, which is primarily made of employees of Government, Public Sector and well-organized Private sector. In fact the current generation entrepreneurs are scions of this middle-class that Communist Trade Unions created.

Yes, the innumerous labor dog-fights would have slowed down the industrial progress of our society. But in my view, it was a much needed fight, without which exploitation would have become uncontrollable in an already feudal Indian society.

Compared to an Asian Tiger country or China or a South American Capitalist dictatorship, we have grown with the democratic pushes and pulls and hence are more sustainable in global competition than other countries that have poor record on Labor rights.

Jyoti Basu was one of the founding pillars of CITU. He played a huge role in creating a specific working class niche for CITU and the Marxists.

The need of human society will  always be empowering of people.

No single ideology can serve this cause fully. The truth is, there is no single solution to the issues of human society. Keeping in mind our goal to empower all sections of people and enabling them to rise up to the occasion, while keeping in mind the overall progress of the society, our policies can take different colors for different solutions. But the idealism to achieve should not be compromised.

Hence the right approach is to keep the idealism burning, and burn the ideology.

I believe that India needs a strong Left, strong Right and a strong Center. Hence it is important for India to have a strong Left presence all over the country, as it must have a strong presence of the Right.

The Left Movement and in particular the two communist parties of India, should make this as a turning point in their history.  The old generation leadership that provided the idealistic base is disappearing. Very soon the parties may be filled up with younger generation which will have only a battered ideology and no idealism like those of the older generation.

When ideology is not backed up by idealism, it will soon wither down and there is a danger of Left Movement totally crumbling or just loosing whatever voice it has. It is not good for the country.

The only way in which Jyoti Basu’s idealism can be furthered is by uniting all the forces of the left under one umbrella, across the nation and working to bring a real strong left movement in India.

It is highly possible, if Left builds a Left front, not as a pre-poll alliance, but a permanent front across the nation and really works at ground level, re-inventing the idealism, that it becomes a strong alternative to the power at center.  For that it needs to connect with people directly, giving up some of its ideological moorings, without giving up on its idealism. It is this idealism of the Left, that can bring people into its fold.

I make this call here, not as a Left, Right or Centrist supporter, but as a Common Man, who wants to have real choices in Indian political parties, similar to the call I made to the BJP to stop in-fighting.

And to Comrade Basu, here is a Lal Salaam, for your service and spirit of idealism that kept you going all these years!

-TBT

Related

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to Comments RSS Feed in this post

10 Responses

  1. Jyoti Basu has made Bangla youths unemployed n all coz of him, we r forced to work in other states n leave our parents at home. It is so wrong to praise him like this.

  2. Actually, I think Basu has been successful in creating the true “communist” regime in middle-class Bengal, where any form of dissent is a crime. He did not make communist Bengal democratic, rather,he muzzled people’s voices and made Bengal similar to China. That is why many communist people here don’t even dare to speak out his felonies he committed during his tenure. He was a cruel Stalinist.

  3. I do agree with you that India needs all three parties-Left,Right and Centrist for a balance across all classes of society. I do also agree fully that the Left ideologies are required and Left should have a strong presence all over the country.
    However,why at all praise Basu for all his idealism? First of all, He is a ravan who put a big lock on all the big industries of Calcutta. Today, states like Maharashtra, AP,TN,Gujarat, Punjab, all have progressed ahead of West Bengal, only because of Basu’s anti-progressive ways of governance. I wouldn’t say his ideologies were bad, but, why did he rule so badly? Why did he allow corruption and rigging in elections if he was so “ideal”? What made him ban English education in the state for many years?
    The fact is that he is no different than Mamata Banerjee at all. He did all this to create publicity. And let me tell you, most communists in West Bengal are just like that. They want to become center of attention and want to make people worship them as idols of idealism and spiritality. They are hypocrites. otherwise, why did this Basu himself study in London and yet ban English education in bengal? He was a crazy megalomaniac. I don’t understand what makes people respect him when he was no different than Mamata Banerjee.

  4. Dear Atanu Dey,

    Kanchan’s blog has nothing to refute what I wrote. It is the same stuff that anyone who has certain views and ideologies will write. I understand them.

    There is no point in me refuting the adjective ridden accusations made on Jyoti Basu.

    They think they are Ram and Jyoti Basu is Ravan.

    Alas, don’t know even Ram appreciated the good qualities of Ravan. And Ravan appreciated the good qualities of Ram, though they did not like each other.

    -TBT

  5. May be you should read this article to have a totally different view

    http://www.dailypioneer.com/228148/Destroyer-of-West-Bengal.html

    It will be a refreshing change from the sugar coated version you are presenting

  6. Dear Bannerjee,

    In my view your blog is not balanced. It is the cliche that exists in minds of people, particularly the upper middle-class minds that are polarized to another ideology.

    I won’t say TamilNadu or Andhra shine compared to Bengal. In fact in certain places they stink compared to Bengal, while in some places they have progressed, benefitting on industrial progress.

    In fact personality wise, Jyoti Basu stands tall compared to other leaders of the state.

    When most chief ministers have amassed crores and crores and abuse power as a matter of right, he is a chief-minister who fought a court-case for 13 years to evict his tenant who lived just below his house. And that too because his doctors advised him not to climb the stairs every day and the tenant did not agree to leave the house, he fought a court-case rather than abuse his power.

    I cannot even dream that in TamilNadu.

    Honestly, while one may differ with ideologies of such people (I have seen such people on both sides of political spectrum), their idealism and simplicity cannot be brushed under. They are examples in their own way.

    -TBT

    • Dear Sir,
      You may be right in stating the personal example of the court case which Mr Jyoti Basu fought and there is no denying the fact that he was a charismatic person who held his party and state for nearly a quarter of a century. But we must remember that history judges a leader by the progress made or not made by society as a whole. And that includes us upper middle class people as well.
      Do I make my point,
      warm regards,
      A Banerjee

  7. Dear anitha,

    Thanks for ur comments and compliments

    -TBT

  8. Great!I totally agree with you.Though I don’t follow politics much,but I greatly admire people like Jyoti Basu, Dr. Manmohan Singh and Mr.P. Chidambaram. They are men of few words. There work speaks.These are people who are genuinly interesred in the country’s wel-being.I really loved your article!